Ben:
Perhaps I’ve had my head stuck in books or drywall dust too
long, but I just had an encounter that told me the political season is
under way. A young man knocked on my door and asked if I’d support his
candidate for the upcoming elections. Ugh, here we go.
Mid-term elections aren’t as bad as presidential ones, but they come close. You take a dissatisfied nation in an economic slump and you can bet your hanging chad that fur is going to fly between now and November, and most likely even after that. Here’s the problem. Mouthpieces from every side made their bones getting people to tune into their television shows, radio shows, pod-casts, blogs, books, magazines, or newspapers. The thing is, each of them, whether they are Chris Matthews or Sean Hannity, has one goal in mind: make money. Sadly, this is done by whipping us all into a frenzy. THE LIBERALS ARE EVIL! GO GET ‘EM!! THE CONSERVATIVES ARE EVIL! GO GET ‘EM!!
Ok, fine, this isn’t new. Since the advent of our political system this sort of thing has been going on. The way things should work is that we get together every couple of years, debate the issues at hand, decide who will best represent out interests, vote for them, and then go about our business. Politics used to have an off season. People’d have a chance to calm down and get on with their lives.
The problem we have now is that Hannity and Matthews are trying to sell Select Comfort mattresses and Life Lock personal security services 24/7, 365. We never get a break from all the rhetoric. Worse than that, this steady drumbeat of “the other side is bad, the other side is bad, the other side is bad” has created a serious deep divide in our country, and this how it's been done. People from each side create a faulty premise. To use a mundane example, let's say there’s a motion to hire a city dog catcher. People on one side say, “Dog catchers hurt dogs, so people who support this motion must want to hurt dogs. Bad people want to hurt dogs, ergo, people who support this motion are bad people.” Now the loudmouths have people on one side thinking people on the other side are bad people because of their stance on a political issue. Sadly, that’s where we are right now. We have many groups pointing and screaming at each other until they’re red in the face.
Mid-term elections aren’t as bad as presidential ones, but they come close. You take a dissatisfied nation in an economic slump and you can bet your hanging chad that fur is going to fly between now and November, and most likely even after that. Here’s the problem. Mouthpieces from every side made their bones getting people to tune into their television shows, radio shows, pod-casts, blogs, books, magazines, or newspapers. The thing is, each of them, whether they are Chris Matthews or Sean Hannity, has one goal in mind: make money. Sadly, this is done by whipping us all into a frenzy. THE LIBERALS ARE EVIL! GO GET ‘EM!! THE CONSERVATIVES ARE EVIL! GO GET ‘EM!!
Ok, fine, this isn’t new. Since the advent of our political system this sort of thing has been going on. The way things should work is that we get together every couple of years, debate the issues at hand, decide who will best represent out interests, vote for them, and then go about our business. Politics used to have an off season. People’d have a chance to calm down and get on with their lives.
The problem we have now is that Hannity and Matthews are trying to sell Select Comfort mattresses and Life Lock personal security services 24/7, 365. We never get a break from all the rhetoric. Worse than that, this steady drumbeat of “the other side is bad, the other side is bad, the other side is bad” has created a serious deep divide in our country, and this how it's been done. People from each side create a faulty premise. To use a mundane example, let's say there’s a motion to hire a city dog catcher. People on one side say, “Dog catchers hurt dogs, so people who support this motion must want to hurt dogs. Bad people want to hurt dogs, ergo, people who support this motion are bad people.” Now the loudmouths have people on one side thinking people on the other side are bad people because of their stance on a political issue. Sadly, that’s where we are right now. We have many groups pointing and screaming at each other until they’re red in the face.
The problem is that the most vocal among us assign
motives to the other side. “They want to take your jobs.” “They want to take
away your freedoms.” “They want to hurt your way of life.” And so on. The mouthpieces (loudmouths) demonize the “they’s” and “thems” to get the “we’s”
and “us’s” all riled up. The political term for this is “energizing the base.”
This has the net effect of making it socially acceptable to
treat strangers badly. These “energized” people want to do their part so badly
that they seize the first opportunity to confront the other side. They think
they can browbeat, harass, and harangue people over to their way of thinking; which is laughable, because it will only cause their opponents to dig in deeper. It's created a toxic environment in our country in which you can’t examine
issues objectively anymore.
The solution? First, avoid
assigning motives to those who oppose you politically. Second, understand that all people (generally speaking) want what’s best for their
country, state, city, county, village, township, etc. The major political
parties in our country are like two parents arguing in front of their children
about who’s right and wrong and they never let up. It's no wonder we get caught
up in their fervor!
The main thing, is don’t assign values to a person you don’t
know simply because they belong to a particular party or movement. Take the
time to get to know others and really sit down and talk with them before
spouting the latest talking points you heard on television. Perhaps if more
of us acted less like sheep and more like thinking, feeling human beings, we’d be able to move forward as a truly united nation.
Esther:
I'm not a political person. I vote because it's one of our rights, and because women didn't start out having that right, so I feel guilty if I don't use my right, but the whole thing really bores me. Considering how well it's been going, turning other things over to each other based on our different strengths and weaknesses (goodbye, checkbook balancing and bill paying!), I admit I'm tempted to ignore politics altogether until voting time, at which point I'd ask Ben to be my own personal Cliff's Notes so I wouldn't have to read the class assignment.
The only election I pay much attention to is the Superbowl of elections, the presidential election, and even then I'm not watching as much for the electoral game as I am for the commercials. Not having learned from high school class president elections, people entertain me by believing their candidates' promises. Every presidential election, people want their guy to win because he'll have the cafeteria replaced with a mall-style food court, and we'll get the right to leave class for a bathroom break whenever we want. Whenever we want, guys! No hall pass needed!
Then the new guy gets into office and maybe a new meal is added to our cafeteria menu rotation. Our old hall pass system remains in place. It's still business as usual. We all shuffle along to our classes. Rinse and repeat next election time.
That's the sunnier side of elections. The darker side is, as Ben said, the Us. vs. Them, the mudslinging, the torches and pitchforks. *Yawn.* "Politics used to have an off season." Indeed. What else is on?
*Changes channel*